Hitting the Sweet Spot: Does E6 “Fix” 3.5?

For a long time now, there has been a lot of discussion about the scalability of Dungeons and Dragons 3.5 and the Pathfinder rules, and I feel like the argument of Linear Fighters vs. Quadratic Wizards sums the technical side of this discussion up nicely. Moreover, I know that I have always enjoyed both playing and running adventures at lower levels with these systems. I feel like these systems are tightest at lower levels, and that the challenges and scenarios at the relatively early stages of these games are the most well balanced. Besides, I’ve always raised an eyebrow at the awesome damage that mere mortals can sustain by virtue of an ever increasing pool of abstract hit points.

One day, while pondering these issues, I came across this wiki.  Could this be the answer to all of my 3.5 related prayers? The premise is simple: Characters do not advance beyond level 6, but continue to gain feats. Certain spells or abilities from beyond this level cap that you may want to include in your game can be added by making them available as feats, or by altering the prerequisites of certain feats. And that’s pretty much it! The goal of this system is to allow your characters to be heroes, but not necessarily superheroes.

While this system isn’t going to work for players and game masters who relish the idea of squaring off against the very deities themselves in a nine round bare knuckle boxing  match, it should satisfy those who have more earthly (yet still quite heroic) pursuits in mind. I also like the potential here to allow for a sustained campaign to go on for quite a large number of sessions without ever having to make the cosmic leap, and without having to watch those quadratic wizards leave those linear fighters in the dust.

I plan on implementing these rules in a new 3.5 campaign that I am going to run with a group of virgin players. Hopefully the game lasts long enough for me to implement these rules and write about my experiences here. 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Hitting the Sweet Spot: Does E6 “Fix” 3.5?

    1. I think I would get a better gauge of how the players react to the glass ceiling if this wasn’t a new group of players who won’t really know what they are not getting. This may be a good thing though. I feel like they will be less resistant to the idea than veteran gamers. Although I like to think that with veteran gamers, if you explained your reasoning behind using E6 and they were confident in your ability to deliver an engaging campaign, that they would be ok with this idea. I may be wrong. Or maybe anyone that would have a problem with it isn’t in my target demographic anyway.

  1. I’d love to hear how this works out. My gut reaction to E6 is that it would be a blast — the “classic” monsters will always be a challenge, but the PCs could get powerful enough to face even a giant if they are clever, while a dragon would never be easy pickings. Honestly my experience with D&D has always been the first six or seven levels are the most fun. Sounds like a winner to me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s